top of page

Most Communication programs start with tactics.  I start with a conversation. 

Gisele and Client

Before a strategy is sketched or a message is drafted, I sit down with the CEO and each program leader and ask the questions many communicators never get to: What does this organization need to accomplish in the next one to three years? What has to change — in policy, in funding, in public understanding — for that to happen? Who holds the power to make that change, and what do they currently believe?


Everything else follows from those answers.

 

I've worked this way for more than two decades, across public health crises and climate campaigns, disaster responses and economic development initiatives, in boardrooms and in communities with little connection to the wider world beyond a cell phone. The sectors change. The discipline doesn't. 

1

I listen before I act

Deep listening is a strategic discipline, not a soft skill.

2

Plan backwards

Every campaign connects to a measurable commitment.

3

Resist conventional solutions

The right answer is rarely the expected one.

4

Ethical storytelling

Informed consent and dignity come before impact.

5

Measure what matters most

Qualitative results reveal what numbes can't.

I'd love to bring this approach to the right organization. If that  might be yours — let’s talk.
1
I listen before I act

One of the first things I do when joining an organization is listen: to leadership, to program staff, to the communities being served. Understanding what a policymaker needs to hear, what a funder needs to trust, what a community actually believes — that foundation determines the quality of everything built on top of it.


2
I build communications backward from outcomes

Every strategy, message, and campaign connects directly to something the organization has committed to achieving — and can be measured against it. I've told more than one CEO: if we can't measure what I'm doing for you, let's not do it. For organizations looking to hire, this means I come ready to make the case for communications as a leadership function.


3
I resist the pull toward conventional solutions

When I take on a new challenge, I ask what this particular organization, with these particular resources  and goals, actually needs. The answer is often something no one expected — and frequently something  that didn't exist before I built it. For example:

  • A global climate policy think tank abandoned standard media placements to promote a new  policy proposal. Instead, it implemented my strategy of hosting an event introducing its proposals  to government ministers at a UN Climate Conference — winning endorsements and unexpected new funding.

  • At an economic development foundation, my communications program translated a complex social enterprise model into storytelling that helped drive $92M in new philanthropic investment.


4
I am an ethical storyteller

The people whose stories advance a mission have entrusted something meaningful. That means informed consent, dignity-first framing, and giving storytellers genuine control. The most powerful stories come from agency, hope, and the specific humanity of people working toward something better.


5
I measure both what's easy to count and what matters most

Quantitative results — news coverage volume, social media reach, subscriber growth — are necessary but insufficient. The results that reveal whether communications is actually working are often qualitative: a policymaker's changed position, a funder's deepened confidence, a partner's decision to align their work with yours. Organizations that demonstrate both make the strongest case for communications as a mission-critical investment — not a line item to cut when budgets tighten.


bottom of page